Ever feel like the error messages you see are in a different language than the one you speak? Even if you understand the words, you’re often left trying to determine the next step. Although some programs provide very good error messages, others leave you wanting more information. Instead of bypassing the error, try using some of these search methods to troubleshoot.
Actionable Error Messages
Over the years Windows has improved its error messages. In the early years, you might be greeted with the infamous blue screen of death (BSOD) with some hexadecimal code. Although this can still happen, it’s rare. Those problematic messages have been replaced with friendlier ones with QR Codes. In addition, you have a stop code listed and a reference URL with troubleshooting steps.
What’s nice about these messages is you have multiple ways of getting to the required page.
Cryptic Error Messages
The flip side is sometimes you can get an error message that provides little actionable information. You may not even be sure which program caused the error. In those instances, search engines can help. Typically when I get one of these errors, I like to see if I can copy the error text to my clipboard. If that’s not possible I’ll take a snapshot of the message with either SnagIt or my cell phone camera.
In this case, I received this error: 1628 Failed To Complete Installation. Simply putting that into Google indicates about 6,760,000 results.
Right away I can tell this a broad error that applies to a lot of software packages. At this point, there are a number of ways I can refine my initial search in Google. These include:
- Filter by time
- Filter by phrase
- Filter by site
- Filter by asset type
Each method has advantages and disadvantages. For example, you may no longer see how many results are availalbe.
Searching By Time
If you look at the screen snap above, you’ll see a menu option called “Tools” to the far-right.
Clicking Tools presents another option menu. If you click the down arrow, you’ll see a list of time options you can select. While this method is useful, the time period is based on the later of a publish or modified date. This means that some articles may show that they are newer, but it’s the modified date that triggered it. The change could be something immaterial to the article like a spelling correction or something crucial.
When you use any of the options on this second line, you lose record count. And, you can’t use these options together. Making a selection on one menu item deselects the other.
Searching by Site or Domain
This option is one of my favorites and involves using the address bar. And it can be used with the time option too. If you glance below, you’ll see I appended my search with site:dell.com. The site command tells Google to just return documents from Dell. I find if an error happens enough, a company has written something about it.
One caution is that you can’t have a space after the colon. If you do you’ll get results from other sites that reference Dell.
If you look above, there is a problem. See it? It’s the last entry where I’ve highlighted jon1628. This happened because my initial search wasn’t in quotes. It’s too generic and picks up this noise.
Searching by Phrase
To limit the noise, you can improve your initial query and put it in quotes. Google will now go out and look for that exact string in quotes. You’ll notice I kept the site reference to Dell, but did not use quotes. Essentially, I’m telling the search engine to just search Dell.com for that exact error message.
The search engine did get me my desired result. And if you’re wondering why there is the second article? It’s an advertisement. There is a tiny marker above the red arrow.
Personally, I’m not a fan of fix it software programs. Many over promise and create other porblems.